Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 21:43:01 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: uhclem%nemesis@fw.ast.com (Frank Durda IV) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I/O port 0 == autoconfig? Message-ID: <199510122043.VAA13781@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <m0t3Nqa-000IuWC@nemesis.lonestar.org> from "Frank Durda IV" at Oct 12, 95 08:38:00 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Frank Durda IV wrote: > > At least one place where this strategy has conflicted is the matcd driver. > It used -1 for the I/O port to signify that it would probe a list > of "known" locations for that hardware, rather than requiring the > user to know. Same for "lpt". -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510122043.VAA13781>