From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 27 16:11:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F2616A4CE for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 16:11:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005AC43D1D for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 16:11:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i4RNAK7V042223 for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 16:10:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i4RNAKHH042222; Thu, 27 May 2004 16:10:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 16:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200405272310.i4RNAKHH042222@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: bin/67236: file(1) does a poor job of recognizing Makefiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 23:11:08 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/67236; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" To: Edwin Groothuis Cc: "Simon L. Nielsen" , FreeBSD Gnats Submit Subject: Re: bin/67236: file(1) does a poor job of recognizing Makefiles Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 16:09:15 -0700 In message <20040527224948.GA2148@k7.mavetju>, you wrote: >On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 03:38:16PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> Excuse me, but it would appear that your suggestion that I take up >> this issue with the (external) maintainer of file(1) may be impractical >> for this simple reason that the specific version of the file(1) > >I found the maintainer of file(1) to be pretty tolerant regarding >this. I have submitted him a patch for file(1) to recognized the >FreeBSD ELF version handling for 5.x binaries against the file(1) >from 5.2.1 which is version 3.41. > >He has incorperated it in the 4.0.9 version, while the layout of >the source was completely different. > >Edwin > >> Would it be possible for the FreeBSD maintainers to upgrade the version >> of file(1) that is being distributed with FreeBSD to version 4.09 which, >> according to the information above, seems to be the now current version? > >Check ports/sysutils/file, it's there. Just not in the base system. Would it be impertinent of me to ask why the latest version of file(1) is not in the base system?