From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 26 05:24:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA06877 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 05:24:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (root@agora.rdrop.com [199.2.210.241]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA06870 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 05:24:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.MCESTATE.COM by agora.rdrop.com with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #17) id m0vzjLV-0008tQC; Wed, 26 Feb 97 05:24 PST Received: from localhost (vince@localhost) by mail.MCESTATE.COM (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA01883; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 05:19:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 05:19:14 -0800 (PST) From: Vincent Poy To: Philippe Regnauld cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [H] Optimal computer for FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Philippe Regnauld wrote: > Conclusion: use Parity RAM, but EDO is unnecessary :-) Ahhh... The problem is some motherboards don't support the parity anyways and x32 is cheaper than x36. Does anyone know if EDO RAM will work on non-EDO machines? Cheers, Vince - vince@MCESTATE.COM - vince@GAIANET.NET ________ __ ____ Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ] GaiaNet Corporation - M & C Estate / / / / | / | __] ] Beverly Hills, California USA 90210 / / / / / |/ / | __] ] HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]