From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon May 15 3: 0:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.2.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E15037B67C for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 03:00:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za) by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12rHfK-0003UF-00; Mon, 15 May 2000 11:59:58 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Cc: Cy Schubert , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System Recovery -- mt not statically linked In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 05 May 2000 08:00:59 MST." <200005051501.e45F1rg63022@cwsys.cwsent.com> Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 11:59:58 +0200 Message-ID: <13406.958384798@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 05 May 2000 08:00:59 MST, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > I suppose you could close the PR. Would it still be a good idea to > have a statically linked mt(1) for users of tar and cpio? My feeling is that the pain of moving binaries around doesn't _seem_ justified for this specific case. Keep in mind, though, that I've never been bitten by this. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message