From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 08:52:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A4D16A4CE; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:52:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ares.wolfpond.org (ns1.wolfpond.org [62.212.96.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6534343D46; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:52:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ftigeot@wolfpond.org) Received: from aoi.wolfpond.org (aoi.wolfpond.org [IPv6:2001:7a8:24db:1:20c:76ff:feb4:27e1]) by ares.wolfpond.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j088qQ0K078030; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:52:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: from aoi.wolfpond.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aoi.wolfpond.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j089qIGp000860; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:52:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: (from ftigeot@localhost) by aoi.wolfpond.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j089qHCW000859; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:52:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ftigeot) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:52:17 +0100 From: Francois Tigeot To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" Message-ID: <20050108095217.GA765@aoi.wolfpond.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050107150038.044adcb7@dolphin.local.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Many linux ports needing update to support amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 08:52:27 -0000 On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:00:38PM -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > It seems the majority of Linux ports are still designated as > "ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=i386". Now that we have 32-bit Linux emulation for > amd64, isn't it time we updated these ports to reflect this? > > Yesterday I installed the new Realplayer 10 port, but it required a lot > of editing of dependent ports' Makefiles, which was quite tedious. I > eventually got Realplayer installed, and it's working, but all this > manual fudging of Makefiles needs to be done away with. > > Is anyone currently looking at this problem? I have filled ports/75852 a few days ago to allow java/linux-sun-jdk14 to install on amd64. It also fixes some other ports such as print/acroread. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/75852 Even though it is a port issue it got assigned to java@ :-/ -- Francois Tigeot