From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 5 3:21:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from noc.demon.net (server.noc.demon.net [193.195.224.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952C31582C for ; Wed, 5 May 1999 03:21:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fanf@demon.net) Received: by noc.demon.net; id LAA05690; Wed, 5 May 1999 11:21:51 +0100 (BST) Received: from fanf.noc.demon.net(195.11.55.83) by inside.noc.demon.net via smap (3.2) id xma005637; Wed, 5 May 99 11:21:48 +0100 Received: from fanf by fanf.noc.demon.net with local (Exim 1.73 #2) id 10eyoE-00055Q-00; Wed, 5 May 1999 11:21:46 +0100 To: current@freebsd.org From: Tony Finch Subject: Re: Any action on PR 10570 ? getting closer to 65K :-( In-Reply-To: <199905041819.LAA14749@apollo.backplane.com> References: Message-Id: Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 11:21:46 +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Dillon wrote: > > I think the worst case you might see is on the order of 50,000 or so > route entries. If you read the PR you'll see that we have over 70,000 routes on some interfaces in our network, and we aren't doing multipath routeing. (We have c. 20,000 modems and our customers have static IP addresses.) > It take a phenominally stupid network setup to create more then that. :-) Tony. -- f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@demon.net Arthur: "Oh, that sounds better, have you worked out the controls?" Ford: "No, we just stopped playing with them." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message