From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Mar  4 15:31:39 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C8C5337B401; Tue,  4 Mar 2003 15:31:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 39DAD43F3F; Tue,  4 Mar 2003 15:31:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from lonesome.lonesome.com (cs242746-11.austin.rr.com [24.27.46.11])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6163714352; Tue,  4 Mar 2003 17:31:35 -0600 (CST)
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Organization: Lonesome Dove Computing Services
To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>,
	Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: New additions to http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:34:37 -0600
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
References: <20030302235403.GA33223@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030302190352.L1326@znfgre.tberna.bet>
In-Reply-To: <20030302190352.L1326@znfgre.tberna.bet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200303041734.37581.linimon@lonesome.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Doug Barton wrote:

> Currently this page is showing a lot of errors that are specific to a
> given platform/version combination ...

[trimmed]

> ... e.g., "chroot: /buildscript: Exec format error"

OK, I've just submitted ports/48935 which attempts to classify
the general case of "port build fails before it really begins" (of
which this is only one example) as "cluster".  I am not married
to the name but we need the concept.  (While "bento" would be
more precise, it might be less intuitive for new ports maintainers.
portmgrs, just pick one and I won't object).

If this change is accepted, once it filters through the errorlog index
creation, I can teach my code to ignore this tag in the by-ports reports.
(IMHO it is still needed in the by-build-environment reports).

mcl


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message