From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue May  6 15:42:57 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA10479
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 6 May 1997 15:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etinc.com (et-gw-fr1.etinc.com [204.141.244.98])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA10470
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 6 May 1997 15:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ntws (ntws.etinc.com [204.141.95.142]) by etinc.com (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA12870; Tue, 6 May 1997 18:49:57 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970506184153.00bbae40@etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 18:41:56 -0400
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
From: dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Subject: Re: if_de.c ???? 
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

At 03:34 PM 5/6/97 -0700, you wrote:
>> Nah, the ppl that care have already switched to the card of the moment, 
>> the Intel Pro/100B.
>> 
>> This is a BIG image blow to FreeBSD...after all the hoopla about how
great th
>e
>> if_de card/driver was in '96.
>
>Bollix.  I've been using the DEC cards around here with great success
>for years (both 100Mbit and 10Mbit) and I have every reason to expect
>to be able to continue to do so.
>
>Chicken little is alive and well in -hackers. :-)

Havent bought one in a while, huh? Or are you running -current?

db