Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:18:46 +0900 From: horio shoichi <bugsgrief@bugsgrief.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make package-recursive Message-ID: <20040823.231846.7ede85c647d0486f.10.0.3.20@bugsgrief.net> In-Reply-To: <20040823025952.GA14519@thai-aec.org> References: <20040822035742.GA13803@thai-aec.org> <200408231014.25298.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20040822035742.GA13803@thai-aec.org> <20040822152625.GA32816@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040823025952.GA14519@thai-aec.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:59:52 +0700 "User &" <pirat@access.inet.co.th> wrote: > > there should some way to tell make that if ports have been made package, > the next time that ports should not have been made again in the > make package-recursive from some other ports. > Unfortunately, no. Change CFLAGS and remake, change some of make options and remake, ... They give (for the most part) single same package name. This problem (no straightforward way to indicate what exactly the outcome is) is inherent even in compilations (or file naming conventions we have). Since make package has undergone build process, and doesn't know if it is being repackaged with the same set of files, it probably took the safest path, which is the right thing, I guess. > -- > with best regards, > psr > > http://www.thai-aec.org > http://www.thai.net/makham > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040823.231846.7ede85c647d0486f.10.0.3.20>