From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Tue Sep  4 06:55:29 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD26FE4617
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue,  4 Sep 2018 06:55:29 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [194.1.144.90])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "puchar.net", Issuer "puchar.net" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD8218A57D;
 Tue,  4 Sep 2018 06:55:28 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w846tCNx018089
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
 Tue, 4 Sep 2018 08:55:12 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from puchar-wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: from localhost (puchar-wojtek@localhost)
 by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id w846t719018086;
 Tue, 4 Sep 2018 08:55:07 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from puchar-wojtek@puchar.net)
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 08:55:07 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net>
To: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, timur@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Future of Samba again
In-Reply-To: <7ab44e8e-6103-d5c4-062c-07d710451823@netfence.it>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1809040854450.17046@puchar.net>
References: <7ab44e8e-6103-d5c4-062c-07d710451823@netfence.it>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 06:55:29 -0000

> this old thread:
>
>> http://linux-unix-open-source.1053819.n5.nabble.com/Future-of-SAMBA-on-FreeBSD-td5932128.html
well i still use 3.6.25 :)

>
>
>
>
> I'm currently using several 4.6 installations, some NT DC, some AD DC, some 
> DC members either in base or in jails on UFS or ZFS and these will need 
> upgrading.
> Also, I'm probably deploying a new AD domain which will need a DC and a 
> fileserver member (both in jails).
>
> So I'm wondering...
>
>
>
>
>
> Since I used this hack (1) when provisioning the AD DCs in a jails on ZFS, 
> will I encounter problems when I upgrade them?
>
>> (1) 
>> http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/Help-provisioning-a-Samba-AD-in-a-jail-on-ZFS-td6218355.html
>
>
>
>
>
> When provisioning a new AD DC on ZFS, would the above hack still work if 
> using Samba?
> Seems not with  4.7 according to (2)...
> What about 4.8?
>
>> (2) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225676
>
>
>
>
> Also, I'm tempted to skip 4.7 completely and move to 4.8 directly; not that 
> I'd get any advantage that I know of, but that would buy me around six months 
> more, before I have to go through this all again.
> Any showstopper?
>
> bye & Thanks
> 	av.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>