From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 16:35:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D6D1065671 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:35:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46CA8FC31 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:35:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from vpn-04.vindaloo.com (vpn-04.vindaloo.com [172.24.144.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0645D88; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:14:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: From: Christopher Sean Hilton To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Oliver Fromme In-Reply-To: <200803121605.m2CG5Z6q052120@lurza.secnetix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:14:52 -0400 References: <200803121605.m2CG5Z6q052120@lurza.secnetix.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Cc: Subject: SchedULE vs BSD scheduler - Was: HP ProLiant DL360 G5 success stories? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:35:05 -0000 On Mar 12, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Those machines work very well with both FreeBSD 6 and 7. > If you install FreeBSD 7, remember to enable ULE instead > of the default BSD scheduler. > What's the advantage of ULE / disadvantage of the default? Is it specific to this hardware?