From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 10 20:57:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9171065670 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [83.235.67.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4598FC1D for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pulstar.local (athedsl-4466801.home.otenet.gr [94.71.104.97]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id nAAKvAmc019327; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:57:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4AF9D3A7.1060806@otenet.gr> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:57:11 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Huff References: <1d7089c40911100809l3f71c819lf7febcf139407c8f@mail.gmail.com> <4AF9A10E.5090603@otenet.gr> <19193.49116.848405.783871@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <19193.49116.848405.783871@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Henry Olyer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libjpeg.so.9 missing from my installation of FBSD 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:57:13 -0000 Robert Huff wrote: > Manolis Kiagias writes: > > >> Where you performing an upgrade of an existing system? >> AFAIK libjpeg.so.* libraries get installed by the graphics/jpeg port. >> This was (fairly) recently upgraded, and if you did not follow the >> /usr/ports/UPDATING instructions carefully, you probably ended up with >> some dependent apps still linked to the old version of the library. >> >> In short, try the following (assuming you use portupgrade): >> >> portupgrade -fr graphics/jpeg >> > > graphics/jpeg is a dependency for a _lot_ of ports. (100+ on > my system.) Were I in the OP's shoes, I'd run pkg_info -R to find > out which ones and feed the (edited) results through pkg_sort. > Otherwise I might find myself rebuilding something like OpenOffice > at an inopportune moment .... > > > Robert "thirty six hours and counting, tra-la" Huff > > I am afraid openoffice is indeed one of the packages linked to jpg.. In this case - and assuming this was caused by an improper upgrade of jpeg - maybe the OP could simply downgrade just the jpeg port to the previous version. The current version provides libjpeg.so.10