Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 00:28:28 -0500 From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <hetzels@westbend.net> To: "Bill Fumerola" <billf@chimesnet.com> Cc: <ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: mod_php4 + ssl + flash Message-ID: <05d801c01c7a$484f0560$8dfee0d1@westbend.net> References: <XFMail.000910184442.shurick@zenon.net> <39BBB3D4.86DE5AFC@aspenworks.com> <052501c01c76$58dbeaa0$8dfee0d1@westbend.net> <20000912011259.A47559@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "Bill Fumerola" <billf@chimesnet.com> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 12:00:18AM -0500, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > > > I had created such a port for the FreeBSD Apache Modualarization Project: > > > > http://www.westbend.net/~hetzels/mod_apache13-1.tgz > > > > Unfortunately, it (apache13-base) won't be imported into the FreeBSD Ports Collection, as I received a few comments that it isn't > > needed. > > The apache situation is out of hand. We have far too many different theories of > what is the right way, and none of them agree. > > Scot's work has worked perfectly for me when I tried it on scratch machines, why > aren't we importing it and ditching the existing scheme? > Apache13-base is actually a non-port - it's only use is to choose the appropriate Apache server (Apache, Apache+IPv6, Apache-SSL) and modules (mod_frontpage, mod_ssl, mod_php[34], ...) when building from the FreeBSD ports tree. The split up of the rest of the apache ports & modules can still proceed. I just need to find the time to update them to the latest versions and resubmit them for review. Scot To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?05d801c01c7a$484f0560$8dfee0d1>