From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jul 10 1:44:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09F614D6E for ; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 01:44:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (iras-1-39.ucdavis.edu [169.237.16.39]) by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA00518 for ; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 01:44:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id IAA04382 for ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 08:44:51 GMT (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 01:44:51 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: small Vim port Message-ID: <19990710014451.A4356@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi folks, I am planning on adding a new Vim port that is the opposite of the current "vim5" port (which has every feature turned on). This new Vim "lite" port is for those of use that use it remotely on server-type machines (replacing vim4 in this reguard). Thus NO X11 nor TCL needed. Should I call this port "vim-lite", "vim-small", or what? -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message