From nobody Thu Sep 23 08:49:42 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-cloud@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E08117D18C8 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pat@patmaddox.com) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HFTPY2zdXz3ll7 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 08:49:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pat@patmaddox.com) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8F25C01BC; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 04:49:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 04:49:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=patmaddox.com; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=BJX6BIdnaszb9DMB62IAsoKwxZ EBABKnOdPPfzWNHyw=; b=FCJEJsWA1TKsJvLkS6capWSZVsQo+93PewgVxVWZ6g OE4TlAzjM7u+MHI02wC1aadU1xy0d8aIHOZezXOxPmuPBtFYR4TcFlJ8nrPWAocC VV1jQy6RJ8FVJbBzxY7Qrl4h95J1aWWj/vg129sTBC+wiGypJ/+3ngUXqdqY+kMv my3WmLV+GXWyQOkC1o2okI/d0u6oQCNbOwbMLLItFD0wiZzKOGjAYBBBxqKUQ4gc vFHubiVk8NizX1MKvebbnyGpuq33wphARTbHaiNKM8abwQm2pDq0ddcT7IpdbG3W vt46gLHaqN52nUZXmKz+27J2YL6E1sYs3idRbqy4/j7w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=BJX6BI dnaszb9DMB62IAsoKwxZEBABKnOdPPfzWNHyw=; b=mLLZPyd3ffrjrp4Y/HKOiP SKfCE+bIS334m+BweY3e4uTeGRaYZWLcCScvzTpvbvMW/sqBjxLXxBulVh48p/FH W5HmC4CQjE+tYwMPYpdo573B/rvNZXNP0G5F4uPVFpnxMu/j6gq3N5KuO5AYKjOB R8iwk9rbgeHvwH5hVx38F2ZmJSJdh6qRJMOGZ3+D/99ThKoCyocQqXBam68ucrX6 TVxpBLQUdY3Unp9Jke34tXz1umsl8GN4ONA97r/9bQhG4kujy7gjSZsIPjGs3vVM 6t20KIuSU+Jao9TBagObrOjwZHffCM+5FJmoPMlHNDbJ/b8vge8VP162DhgonTFA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudeiledgtdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffokfggtgfgsegrkehmre ertdejnecuhfhrohhmpedfrfgrthcuofgrugguohigfdcuoehprghtsehprghtmhgruggu ohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevtdevgedvheeuvdekudeggeelfffgud duveetgedtudelhfefgfffkeffheehffenucffohhmrghinhepfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhr ghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehprg htsehprghtmhgrugguohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 04:49:44 -0400 (EDT) From: "Pat Maddox" To: freebsd-cloud@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current status of ZFS AMIs on EC2? Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 01:49:42 -0700 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673) Message-ID: <65D39FF2-C14D-430E-A83B-0C3606E0D7AF@patmaddox.com> List-Id: FreeBSD on cloud platforms (EC2, GCE, Azure, etc.) List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-cloud List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-cloud@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_2131FD5B-E26E-42AF-8ADC-75490D76EF96_=" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HFTPY2zdXz3ll7 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=patmaddox.com header.s=fm1 header.b=FCJEJsWA; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=mLLZPyd3; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pat@patmaddox.com designates 66.111.4.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pat@patmaddox.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.60 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.29]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[patmaddox.com:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.29:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.0.0/20, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[patmaddox.com:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[pat]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-cloud@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[patmaddox.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[66.111.4.29:from] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --=_MailMate_2131FD5B-E26E-42AF-8ADC-75490D76EF96_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed; markup=markdown Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi there, I came across Colin’s 2019 post announcing ZFS AMIs for EC2 [1]. I haven’t seen any more recent information regarding ZFS on EC2. I’ve launched one instance, and it appears to work fine from initial tests (including recovering a known working boot env using beadm). I have also installed the official 12 and 13 releases, and see that they are UFS. I have two questions: 1. Is anyone using the ZFS AMIs for production? 2. Why has ZFS not been incorporated into the official releases? Thanks, Pat [1] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-cloud/2019-February/000200.html --=_MailMate_2131FD5B-E26E-42AF-8ADC-75490D76EF96_=--