From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 17 22:57:55 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA28079 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 22:57:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org ([204.144.255.49]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA28059 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 22:57:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.7.5/8.6.6) with SMTP id XAA28396 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 1996 23:56:48 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199607180556.XAA28396@rover.village.org> Subject: Re: Cygnus Engineering Talk on Linux To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 17 Jul 1996 23:44:45 MDT Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 23:56:48 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk : : And things like lmbench don't help also :( : : :-). I just got asked in private mail how I could run a TCP/IP stack : on my machine with such horrible latency. I told them I ran a stack : that worked and it went down hill from there. : : What the heck is lmbench and why is it so wrong? Dang, shouldn't have hit that send so fast. I don't want to start a flame war here. If there is a pointer, then point me at. I saw some stuff in the archive, but not enough to answer the particular question that I had (re latency). Thanks a bunch... Warner