Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 10:14:54 -0800 From: Charles Henrich <henrich@flnet.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: inetd() in realloc: junk pointer too low.. Message-ID: <19990208101454.24242@orbit.flnet.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpvhhczryn.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from Dag-Erling Smorgrav on Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 07:10:56PM %2B0100 References: <19990207095120.05798@orbit.flnet.com> <xzp3e4hbpp0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <19990208093725.46808@orbit.flnet.com> <xzpvhhczryn.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On the subject of Re: inetd() in realloc: junk pointer too low.., Dag-Erling
Smorgrav stated:
> BTW, what you're running is an old snapshot of the development branch of
> FreeBSD. This means, succintly:
What kind of crack are you on? Last I checked releases were *RELEASES*
granted, 3.0 was a new release, expected to have some bugs, but a release
nontheless. By no means a snapshot release.
> c) if you find a bug, check that it still occurs with the latest version of
> -CURRENT before reporting it.
d) Your selfrightousness is uncalled for, and uneeded. Im sure it makes
you feel big and important to point out the obvious things about snapshot
release along current, but really now, does it really add anything to the
discussion? No.
-Crh
Charles Henrich Manex Visual Effects henrich@flnet.com
http://orbit.flnet.com/~henrich
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990208101454.24242>