From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 3 07:59:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74449F20 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 07:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [84.237.50.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1857B856 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 07:59:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WVcY7-0008Tr-Hy; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:59:04 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s337wT4O052506; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 14:58:39 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id s337wOGF052467; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 14:58:24 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 14:58:24 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Matthias Gamsjager Subject: Re: Leaving the Desktop Market Message-ID: <20140403075824.GA50437@regency.nsu.ru> References: <082a01cf4db9$240d3e90$6c27bbb0$@FreeBSD.org> <201404012240.s31MeIe4073267@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <20140403014419.GA45830@regency.nsu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 1 X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Lua-Profiles: 59182 [Apr 03 2014] X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Version: 5.3.6 X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Envelope-From: danfe@regency.nsu.ru X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Rate: 0 X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not_detected X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Method: none X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Moebius-Timestamps: 2857447, 2857477, 2857459 X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server 8.0.0.455, not checked X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: NotChecked: not checked, skipped X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:15:42 +0000 Cc: michael@rancid.berkeley.edu, FreeBSD Current , Garrett Wollman X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 07:59:14 -0000 On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 09:49:31AM +0200, Matthias Gamsjager wrote: > > There are a few alternatives to Lightroom available in Ports Collection, > > you might want to give them a try one day. > > > offtopic: > But it does not even come close to Lightroom. Gimp is also not even > close to Photoshop. Maybe Pixelmator. But Gimp? The UI and usability > is such a mess. Since when is GIMP an alternative to Lightroom? I was talking about raw processors, not raster image manipulators. ./danfe