From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 13:12:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7447937B405 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:12:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.liwing.de (mail.liwing.de [213.70.188.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38C443FBF for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:12:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rehsack@liwing.de) Received: (qmail 27909 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2003 20:12:50 -0000 Received: from stingray.liwing.de (HELO liwing.de) ([213.70.188.164]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.liwing.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2003 20:12:50 -0000 Message-ID: <3F243242.8000200@liwing.de> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 22:12:50 +0200 From: Jens Rehsack Organization: LiWing IT-Services User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ceri Davies References: <200307272000.h6RK0w4J075731@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200307272000.h6RK0w4J075731@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/54926: [PATCH] enable choose of ghostscript interpreter X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 20:12:53 -0000 On 27.07.2003 22:00, Ceri Davies wrote: > Synopsis: [PATCH] enable choose of ghostscript interpreter > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: ceri > State-Changed-When: Sun Jul 27 13:00:58 PDT 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > Duplicate of ports/54918. > Please take care when submitting PRs; we got 38 copies of this. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=54926 This is not duplicate PR! Please take care to the content, the patch all another port, but they all have the same goal. Sure, as I received the response I recognized, that including name of the port to the Synopsis would be a very good idea next time. Sorry. Do you open them again or do I have to re-submit? Best wishes, Jens