From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 15 07:05:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B504F16A41F for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:05:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BA9743D5A for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:05:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: (qmail 30876 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2005 07:05:45 -0000 Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 15 Dec 2005 07:05:45 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:05:45 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20051215.080545.74719904.sthaug@nethelp.no> To: markir@paradise.net.nz From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: <43A0EC9F.9080800@paradise.net.nz> References: <43A0E607.2030101@alumni.rice.edu> <43A0E916.7070204@samsco.org> <43A0EC9F.9080800@paradise.net.nz> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel cpu entries X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:05:49 -0000 > Is a minor update to the handbook needed in order avoid confusion then? > e.g. I have been commenting out CPU_I586 on all my PIII systems in the > (mistaken it would seem) belief that having CPU_I686 only was better. I've been doing the same thing myself - removing the CPU_I586 on PIII and newer systems. An update would be good. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no