From owner-freebsd-libh  Sat Sep 23  9:57:59 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1E41F37B42C; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 09:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e8NGvY639286;
	Sat, 23 Sep 2000 09:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com)
To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>
Subject: Re: Check out the UI abstraction of this thing 
In-Reply-To: Message from "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> 
   of "Sat, 23 Sep 2000 20:50:25 +0900." <39CC9901.F33D11C8@newsguy.com> 
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 09:57:34 -0700
Message-ID: <39282.969728254@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> John Baldwin wrote:
> > 
> > Err, it's all Tcl scripts in libh.
> 
> Well, one thing is having the installation applets as tcl scripts.
> Another thing entirely is being able to automate the installation
> without having to replace these applets.

And I think it's fair to say that any system which has an interpreted
scripting language this heavily embedded in its design philosophy is
hardly going to fall short when this rather obvious issue comes up.
Go read my paper. :)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message