From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 20:01:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C45F700 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 20:01:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECD0D81 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 20:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TzBwE-0000s4-Aq for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 21:01:18 +0100 Received: from a91-154-115-217.elisa-laajakaista.fi ([91.154.115.217]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 21:01:18 +0100 Received: from rakuco by a91-154-115-217.elisa-laajakaista.fi with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 21:01:18 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Raphael Kubo da Costa Subject: Adopting porttools upstream? Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:00:51 +0200 Lines: 26 Message-ID: <87r4l7ogss.fsf@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a91-154-115-217.elisa-laajakaista.fi User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:iQoC3D7sEz4ERd+W7/jxMp6/aps= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 20:01:10 -0000 Hi there, sergei@'s commit bit was taken into safekeeping years ago and porttool's project in SourceForge [1] has not seen any CVS commit for a long time as well. [1] https://sourceforge.net/projects/porttools Meanwhile, we've been patching ports-mgmt/porttools to keep up with our infrastructure changes and whatnot. I was thinking of integrating those fixes upstream and continuing the development somewhere else. skreuzer@ seems to have a fork on GitHub [2] with no previous history and some commits on top. [2] https://github.com/skreuzer/porttools I, for one, ran devel/cvs2svn on the existing CVS history and converted it to git. The result looks OK and can be see in [3]. [3] https://github.com/rakuco/porttools I'm not terribly interested in becoming porttools' upstream myself, but if others fail to jump aboard that could end up happening. Thoughts?