From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 3 09:59:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8DF2699 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 09:59:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [84.237.50.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C7CF3CA for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 09:59:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WVeQF-0003Tn-K3; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 16:59:05 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s339wj5s081508; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 16:58:55 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id s339weiH081467; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 16:58:40 +0700 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 16:58:40 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Matthias Gamsjager Subject: Re: Leaving the Desktop Market Message-ID: <20140403095840.GA79573@regency.nsu.ru> References: <082a01cf4db9$240d3e90$6c27bbb0$@FreeBSD.org> <201404012240.s31MeIe4073267@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <20140403014419.GA45830@regency.nsu.ru> <20140403075824.GA50437@regency.nsu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 1 X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Lua-Profiles: 59189 [Apr 03 2014] X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Version: 5.3.6 X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Envelope-From: danfe@regency.nsu.ru X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Rate: 0 X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not_detected X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Method: none X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Moebius-Timestamps: 2858065, 2858118, 2858063 X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server 8.0.0.455, not checked X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: NotChecked: not checked, skipped X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:15:54 +0000 Cc: FreeBSD-CURRENT ML X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 09:59:14 -0000 On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 11:21:34AM +0200, Matthias Gamsjager wrote: > > Since when is GIMP an alternative to Lightroom? I was talking about > > raw processors, not raster image manipulators. > > The opensource alternatives to Lightroom come not close to the original. They maybe not yet a drop-in replacement, but they are competitive enough to be discussed on photo forums (read: outside open source geeky cabal): http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/32-digital-processing-software-printing/242584-darktable-vs-lightroom.html http://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/37238/how-does-darktable-compare-to-adobe-lightroom-for-editing-jpegs http://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/23272/simple-comparison-of-lightroom-4-corel-aftershot-pro-darktable http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/39475179 As they say, "The differences in actual editing are negligible. It's not even worth migrating between the two. LR comes with a price-tag, Darktable comes with bugs." ./danfe