From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 22 16:40:38 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FDB6585C1 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 16:40:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gt1MT1XGCz4mYy for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 16:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gt1MK6PKbzDyQG for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 09:40:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1629650429; bh=k45PKtQlt8Yl1R43KC742NJJAzKJ0EriX7+LwoO+dTQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gwL1NxXo38+wFI+tmrshLcGN5Tb97OAsXZvuXUqfJhhmynaZtGcNy5EG++sH1RSuW VSuyF4p//5gpfJ7cDPyKSxzwSn5rF3Ra7VQ6yxwLPSvvkgtMavBZMVGYFAFF4k5yRO chiQMULjpmRxM1i0Mcy83s6QSrewgpjgAd2WFx+g= X-Riseup-User-ID: 1F389870849338FEE37B1EB6D778D373E3B6D392BA4D7E3F9076358D73EDDD87 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Gt1MK34wgz1yBS for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 09:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 18:40:27 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DKIM Message-ID: <20210822184027.5ddae2e0@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <207e382e-fad4-68f6-de81-df7ca2e1a40f@kicp.uchicago.edu> References: <763F5C0F-E364-4C57-8D09-A0679F547979@simonhoffmann.net> <20210822121658.13a66645@archlinux> <207e382e-fad4-68f6-de81-df7ca2e1a40f@kicp.uchicago.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Gt1MT1XGCz4mYy X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=gwL1NxXo; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.37 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; SUBJ_ALL_CAPS(0.30)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.93)[0.933]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 16:40:38 -0000 On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 10:04:58 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >Just for fun I tested, and this another "google" search engine did >not better than my regular "duckduckgo" into technical part, or even >rather did worse towards "t-shirts" and other stuff you mentioned ;-) Valeri, did you try to search for t-shirts by image? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/search_by_image/ "A powerful reverse image search tool, with support for various search engines" The default search engines seem to be "Google, Bing, Yandex, Baidu and TinEye", at least those are checked here. IIRC I never edited the checked/unchecked search engines. The complete list of reverse image search engines doesn't contain DuckDuckGo [1]. >Department of Astronomy A few days back we had 3 active meteor showers, one of them the Perseids close at their peak. I've done a 30 seconds interval, by 20 seconds time exposures and 10 seconds processing time. Don't worry, I'll come back to Google vs other search engines. I got a lot of plane navigation lights, everything that looks like a meteor at a first glance obviously are planes far away, since they start at 1 interval and continue for usually 2 intervals, but at least for a second interval. One shot shows something, that likely is a satellite flare. One "star" seems to be only visible on 1 interval out of 721 interval shots + 1 test shot before starting the interval. The shooting was done in the night from 14 to 15 August. IIUC even a supernova is visible for longer than 30 seconds, let alone that this August a visible supernova was days before the night from 14 to 15 August. Btw. I didn't try a reverse image search engine, but googled and made my way by following one link by another, IIRC starting with Wikipedia. There seems to be not a single meteor on any of the 722 photos. Probably no search engine is much of a help to analyse the photos since I don't have any astronomical skills. For BSD, Linux, POSIX, UNIX novices man pages and search engines are similar useless. Today I like man pages a lot, but in the beginning I was in favour of search engines, since man pages were way to hard to understand without enough basic knowledge. However, you are able to use DuckDuckGo with good search terms. A real beginner tends to use naive search terms and due to Google's advanced analysis and data mining, Google IMO provides more useful hits. Keep in mind, Google knows when search engine users are pregnant, before the users know they are, but maybe this is just an urban myth. If so, its a good myth. Regards, Ralf [1] Google Images Bing Images Yandex.Images Baidu Image Search Sogou Images TinEye Reverse Image Search Karma Decay trace.moe SauceNAO lqdb Ascii2d Getty Images iStock Shutterstock Adobe Stock Depositphotos Pintarest Qihoo 360 Images Jingdong Taobao Alibaba China Mail.ru Image Search Dreamstime Alamy 123RF eSearch plus TMview Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Australien Trade Mark Search Australien Design Search IPONZ Trade Mark Check Graphic Image Park PimEyes Stocksy United Pond5 PIXTA IKEA Reddit Repost Sleuth