From nobody Wed Nov 2 20:57:00 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4N2fNM2M7zz4gvJY for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 20:57:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com (mail-pl1-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4N2fNK65dGz4LT5; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 20:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d24so23607pls.4; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 13:57:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aLdJhrGpt5ltqpFmryW060jzNpfuHjmL+jfjLt6LvVU=; b=suMYtKPNvRstccjm2cBRMkLBmFxWS0T+cPvi9ycqDs0Z2qBiiPnF9oDO2YVrUOHGeC Z54OT1UGID4WQep61kdaF2UpCP/8ITdh2bDEn97gJKFAwtQq+a6WJkJCsXPutHAYlNp2 aOPkIrRO+QjumZrbGkW8e3AC4OT+Dh+d0i1ydL/z43a3LFzsP/RolgykjJp3r9MieaN+ XEp+GKmsrKpqMm7JGV0SD0oCgLOvYvB/QjoM98r72oNmfuVZgHNM76oNVelZO87cRUsn en+Evg5E/EeGGA9jdhPjlJnIBDh72a3kRD/5BmixM0KSGKLwpwAB7pSEE73FLVyZP6QR Al8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2jeqe+iAVnSZbSayAwwldKzwcILz9t0z3gYMQ9e3RPkGkTouQB h3mlebH7IVs8PlHCPujlAKuFnHRt2zf1sqFilQCGS2Oy X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM754J1NHSrD87nrocX3csOyTRzHf2Uu3hv05gISRORntCHooE/NOPpkBaeymAB5BlGJg+sfsaHJ7/+qtj+UtwY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7c91:b0:17f:6711:1fac with SMTP id y17-20020a1709027c9100b0017f67111facmr26751082pll.118.1667422655682; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 13:57:35 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-stable List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221101222046.AB5483910@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: From: Thomas Zander Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 21:57:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-22:21.zfs To: Jonathan Vasquez Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Errata Notices Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4N2fNK65dGz4LT5 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[riggs@freebsd.org,thomasezander@gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.214.172:from]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[riggs@freebsd.org,thomasezander@gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.214.172:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 at 15:12, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > > I spoke to Richard today, and asked him your question on your behalf. He = said the following: > > "Most of the time, the issue does not go to disk. When it does they are n= ot well understood yet. He would probably know if it did since things could= go horribly wrong, but if he wants to try to be sure, he could try using z= db -bcc ... to try to verify certain things about his pool, but again, the = results of undefined behavior in the btree code is not well understood. It = is a very complex thing to analyze and I have not had time to do that. Ther= e are a couple of bug reports in GitHub that I suspect are related, but can= not prove currently." OK, cool, thanks for updating us on the current knowledge of the bug. Appreciate it!