From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 21:54:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FCE16A4CE; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 21:54:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2212D43D6D; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 21:54:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5DDED5135A; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:00:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:00:33 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: mark@markdnet.demon.co.uk Message-ID: <20041207220033.GB31640@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041207163843.GL9803@elch.haidundneu23.net> <20041207175217.3138143D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041207175217.3138143D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: Christoph Moench-Tegeder Subject: Re: Large port updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:54:16 -0000 --7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 05:52:15PM +0000, mark@markdnet.demon.co.uk wrote: > cmt@burggraben.net wrote: >=20 > > Not in this case. Check /usr/ports/UPDATING 20041107: > > : Do NOT use portupgrade(1) to update your GNOME 2.6 desktop to 2.8 >=20 > Last time this happened, this is what caused my to deinstall gnome. THe u= pgrade script could take weeks to run on a reasonable spec machine because = it insisted on rebuilding all sorts of stuff. You couldn't stop it, or it w= ould start over. So install from packages instead of ports, if you don't like to compile things yourself. Taking "weeks to run" is an extreme exaggeration though, unless your "reasonable spec machine" is a 486. > It seems to me that its a product of gnome being so many ports. Why > not just have a few, like KDE (although it appears KDE is going the > way of gnome - if this results in portupgrade not working there > either, its insanity). That doesn't make a lot of sense - you have to compile the same amount of code whether it's in 5 packages or 20. Regardless, it's the decision the gnome project has made, and it's not up to the freebsd project to do it differently. Kris P.S. Please wrap your lines at 70 characters so your emails may be easily read. --7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBtigBWry0BWjoQKURAqa9AKDkpGLt1CYOdt/RCtDllfeSw2oCJwCfbsow Z1nQssaUZJwVA3ARIdDlR24= =uWAm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2--