From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Feb 5 07:19:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA28354 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 07:19:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from obie.softweyr.ml.org ([199.104.124.49]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA28256 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 07:19:40 -0800 (PST) Received: (from wes@localhost) by obie.softweyr.ml.org (8.7.5/8.6.12) id IAA08891; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 08:23:43 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 08:23:43 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199702051523.IAA08891@obie.softweyr.ml.org> From: Wes Peters To: Brent Russell CC: questions@freebsd.org Subject: installation In-Reply-To: <199702042120.QAA08649@sable.cc.vt.edu> References: <199702042120.QAA08649@sable.cc.vt.edu> Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Brent Russell writes: > I currently run Windows95 on a single DOS partition. Should I install > WindowsNT 4.0, or FreeBSD 2.1.6.1 first? Will it make a difference? If you install FreeBSD last, it will install the BootEasy boot manager, which will identify and allow you to boot all three OS's. If you install NT last, you'll simply need to re-install BootEasy from the FreeBSD cdrom after you've installed NT. I'd go with installing FreeBSD last. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.xmission.com/~softweyr softweyr@xmission.com