From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 22 11:27:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA09122 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 11:27:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sasami.jurai.net (winter@sasami.jurai.net [207.153.65.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA09092 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 18:27:35 GMT (envelope-from winter@jurai.net) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA12313; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 14:24:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 14:24:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: Garrett Wollman cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , Harlan Stenn , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/6353 In-Reply-To: <199804221423.KAA01392@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Garrett Wollman wrote: > Strongly disagree. Every NFS system out there comes with an > automounter of some sort or another. Most of them come with Sun's > broken automount(8), for which the source is thankfully unavailable. > amd is an important, fundamental part of an NFS implementation (and > one which we may need to hack at times in order to reflect changes in > our kernel code). It looks like am-utils and amd are the same thing, a few years removed from eachother. I don't see what the problem is. /* Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53 */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message