From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 14:31:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2AA16A4CE; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:31:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C65E43D46; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:31:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004032422314401600t3jvfe>; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:31:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA66608; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:35:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:35:05 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <20040324141407.F88409@qbhto.arg> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: "cvs-all@FreeBSD.org" cc: "cvs-src@FreeBSD.org" cc: "src-committers@FreeBSD.org" cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav cc: David O'Brien Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin Makefile src/usr.bin/doscmd AsyncIO.c README.booting_dos bios.c callback.c callback.h cmos.c com.h config.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:31:47 -0000 On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Doug Barton wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > I think most people heard "tjr assented to waiting" as the end of the > > discussion. > > > > remember emails can get re-orderred.. > > This is where a good threaded mail reader helps. :) Seriously though, > is there a strong, well-reasoned objection to the action by des, or can > we let this one go? As I said, my opinion is biased, but I don't see any > harm here on the tech side, nor do I see any bad faith on des' part. > I don't think that, now that it's done, we should bring it back, but I do think that he got a different impression about the conversation that I got. > I'll step out now and let people respond. > > Doug > > -- > > This .signature sanitized for your protection > >