Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 08:10:00 -0600 (CST) From: "Kenneth P. Stox" <ken@stox.pr.mcs.net> To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@MindBender.serv.net> Cc: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>, hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2G SCSI disks? Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970204080943.396F-100000@m4.stox.pr.mcs.net> In-Reply-To: <199702041043.CAA22950@MindBender.serv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > ... "close to the performance of an Ultra-SCSI disk" only if you don't > have any concurrency! There IS a difference. > > Remind yourself that there's a reason RAID towers don't use SCSI > drives... > > (Which is fine if you know what you're getting into, but don't truly > expect IDE to be able to do everything as well as SCSI, no matter what > the marketing people say.) > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@MindBender.serv.net > --< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >-- > NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3, > Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32... > NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others... > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.95.970204080943.396F-100000>