From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 20 04:00:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62ED316A4CE for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 04:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay7-f48.bay7.hotmail.com [64.4.11.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F10143D5A for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 04:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from miluetz@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 04:00:02 -0700 Received: from 195.127.24.178 by by7fd.bay7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:00:01 GMT X-Originating-IP: [195.127.24.178] X-Originating-Email: [miluetz@hotmail.com] X-Sender: miluetz@hotmail.com From: "Michael Luetz" To: sos@DeepCore.dk Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:00:01 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Apr 2004 11:00:02.0127 (UTC) FILETIME=[A11785F0:01C426C6] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 05:06:16 -0700 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no root fs in CURRENT kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:00:02 -0000 Hi, I'm sorry but the patches have no effect on my system. After rebuilding the kernel and rebooting I get the same error messages. Best regards, Michael >From: Søren Schmidt >To: Michael Luetz >CC: freebsd-current@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: no root fs in CURRENT kernel >Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:29:31 +0200 > >Michael Luetz wrote: >>Hi, >> >>today's (Apr 19th) CURRENT can't find the root fs anymore > >Thats because of the PCI code changes, it does not properly handle the >BAR's on ATA controllers (they are special and an exception of the worser >kind :) ) > >I have two patches that solves this is different ways (both attached >below). The first one just makes the PCI code aware of the specialness of >the ATA BAR's and takes the right action on it. The second one is not >really for mass consumption yet, as it will try to use you ATA controller >in "native PCI" mode if its possible. This hasn't been tested much yet, and >I sure there are HW out there that breaks with this, but it would be >interesting to gain more knowledge on it by getting it tested especially on >platforms thats broken with the current code. > >-- >-Søren > _________________________________________________________________ E-Mails sind zu unpersönlich? Mit einer Webcam wird der MSN Messenger zum Bildtelefon! http://www.msn.de/messenger Jetzt kostenlos downloaden und mitmachen!