Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Jun 2000 07:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>
To:        Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
Cc:        Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>, Jung-uk Kim <juikim@engin.umd.umich.edu>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Anybody working on FreeBSD BIOS?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006160720250.268-100000@clockwork.csudsu.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006152300150.12294-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Doug White wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Stefan Molnar wrote:
> 
> > I have not built clusters over 200 nodes, but I almost never 
> > go into the BIOS for configurations.  And the systems that 
> > I have used, include serial access within the BIOS.   And
> > adding PXE roms will make things nicer on the install front.
> > But my current system is a single floppy, and that works
> > well.
> 
> As someone who has built one of these large systems, the best thing we
> could want is OpenFirmware with a ROM monitor and Lights-Out Monitoring.  
> Basically make a PC act like a Sun Netra T1. :)

I love the NetraT1, I am now using them at Major broadcasters and
at DirecTV.   But gettting the LOM functionality to x86 is a completly
diffrent matter.   Since it has to act independtly from the mainboard.
I would much rather see the BIOS be converted to OpenBoot.  Since
that works greatly.

> In real life, the only BIOS problems that require human intervention are
> usually hardware related.  You can't avoid the trip to the colo in this
> case.  

I picked the remote hands service plan at my colo to be that human.  When
I see it is an issue to go that route.
 
> The buildout cost is pretty spendy too, having to buy a Cisco 2511 or
> similiar term server for every 24-odd boxen.  For us, this would mean
> buying 20 or so units and cabling up every box, which we don't have the
> time to do. We just leave 9" mono VGA displays and keyboards in the cage
> and call up the remote-hands when things die.  We let them power cycle
> things but if it's really hosed we drive over and frob the box ourselves.

I went the 2611 route with 32port async module, but the overall time
and effort does save in the long run.  I am a firm beliver that 
serial console for servers, and remote systems is not an option.
I is a must.  It has saved alot of down time.  I delgated the remote-hands
to being my human on-off switch, or a "blinky light" monitor.  

> BTW the PXE loader stuff is invaluable for installs.  Saves having to
> track down a (usually broken) floppy to load a system up.  A few
> keypresses at boot and voila, new FreeBSD box. :)  I will probably give a
> talk at BSDCon about these issues, if I can get everything lined up.

And I will be right there in the audiance.

> > The best people to determin if it is nessesary is Yahoo and Hotmail.
> > Since they have worked with these issues in the thousands of machines.
> 
> Sigh, it's not easy being #6. Even with 16 million confirmed members
> eGroups gets no respect  :)

Yeah, I normaly forget about them, I think eCircles uses FBSD as
well.


Stefan


> Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
> dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu     |  www.FreeBSD.org
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0006160720250.268-100000>