Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:25:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION Message-ID: <slrnfu1qhi.21d2.vadim_nuclight@hostel.avtf.net> References: <200803122100.m2CL0t7V088955@freefall.freebsd.org> <slrnfthsg7.dgk.vadim_nuclight@hostel.avtf.net> <20080313094356.GA9219@tin.it> <47DF72A3.4030502@yandex.ru> <47DF78AF.400@elischer.org> <47DF81CF.9040906@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Andrey V. Elsukov! On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:48:15 +0300; Andrey V. Elsukov wrote about 'Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION': >>> 1. tablearg: it's possible, but now we use u32 argument in >>> tables, but counterlimits are 64-bits values. First of we >>> should extend our current table argument to 64 bit. >> >> tables should be expanded to have different types of values.. >> 32 but ints >> IP addresses (currently I'm overlaying it on 32 bit ints) >> IPV6 addresses. >> skipto locations > Yes, i agree. As I remember, we already talked about this > some time ago. Can you please recall what else you've discussed? :) -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnfu1qhi.21d2.vadim_nuclight>