From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 20:18:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3074516A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:18:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADAD43D53 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:18:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from [208.206.78.97] (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F187A403; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:18:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4227712F.5060906@elischer.org> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 12:18:55 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kamalp@acm.org References: <20050303041042.3198.qmail@web52709.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050303041042.3198.qmail@web52709.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Lucas Holt Subject: Re: sched_4BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:18:56 -0000 Kamal R. Prasad wrote: >--- Julian Elischer wrote: > > > >>Kamal R. Prasad wrote: >> >> >> >>>--- Lucas Holt wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Wouldn't a multi threaded program potentially need >>>>more cpu time than >>>>vi? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>No. That is not a given. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Multithreaded apps are created to do a lot of >>>>computation or >>>>because they have a lot of concurrent activity >>>> >>>> >>that >> >> >>>>might block right? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>Threads are meant to take advantage of concurrency. >>> >>> >>>Maybe the freebsd implementation should implement >>> >>> >>NPTL >> >> >>>in entirety. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>NPTL? >>New Pthreads Library from Library? >> >> >Yes. > > >>isn't that GPL'd? >> >> >> >No -it is a standard. The linux implementation of nptl >is gpl'ed. >regards >-kamal > > so how does that differ from what we have ... a native pthreads library? > > >===== >------------------------------------------------------------ >Kamal R. Prasad >UNIX systems consultant >kamalp@acm.org > >In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is:-). >------------------------------------------------------------ > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com > >