Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 15:47:46 -0500 (EST) From: "Geoffrey C. Speicher" <geoff@speicher.org> To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: 1:N threading Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10304031503370.2892-100000@speicher.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OK, so we've got 1:N threading (libc_r), 1:1 threading (thr), and M:N threading (KSE). Each model has its own merit depending on the application. However, it would still be nice if the 1:N model didn't block the whole process when a thread blocks. Is there any reason to hold onto a pure userland implementation of 1:N? Can libc_r be implemented in terms of KSE? Geoff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10304031503370.2892-100000>