From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 10:11:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADEA37B401 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:11:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E795843FD7 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:11:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h7BHBOFL085088; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:11:25 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:11:22 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030811.111122.61230509.imp@bsdimp.com> To: kuku@physik.rwth-aachen.de From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030811073027.GA16832@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> References: <20030811073027.GA16832@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pccard entires still ok? X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:11:28 -0000 In message: <20030811073027.GA16832@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> "Christoph P. Kukulies" writes: : pccard_enable="YES" : pccard_mem="DEFAULT" : pccard_beep="2" no. yes : pccard_ifconfig="wi0" yes. no. : still appropriate? Or are they obsolete? see above for the answer to this question. : Just thinking about it in the vein of the current trouble with : DHCP etc. since pccard interfaces have changed in the past. We still use pccard_ifconfig, but the others have gone away. Warner