From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 21 18:21:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328908A7 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 18:21:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dcamp314@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C22D7208A for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 18:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id t60so1606666wes.8 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 11:21:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=24+Ga0g2vlLTTRtBewW/EJBA84MIHE84a61zZifuCAo=; b=YRrtcmbp/eZKogyE33OJ6HloBLwSIUu6Ay/QpxRqjx693UG2bBTbpUirnm/Ez8CBf7 lNbGFNhHsFGNGCW66o6tGvOht0FfSLyTOF2DD7r6DlQ0/MRTGrgC75UMy/wX+8qPbjlA q1XJY8JWaQhZ3fF43zUn7BaMhHHyYluV0dMK8WlF8ArH3Wjpmj5yED1l9pvBNpyqi4mO WMCpPz8fi5Dws3DkpY6p7GmiWZypYbWkzkNYbdGE8qUv5MHMFDSo8K72+t0leerJsRD7 Z8MLL7RsbLSGzQXIdZZdIow0ishjU3OhZ6NlZZVMRAthu5F1n9P3stkZEYT3k7UnwbJh 1dGg== X-Received: by 10.180.183.51 with SMTP id ej19mr7282186wic.60.1379787680099; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 11:21:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: dcamp314@gmail.com Received: by 10.227.212.77 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 11:20:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Christian Campbell Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 14:20:40 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: sObvziR2wW9__F87YBpzycyNsFc Message-ID: Subject: Wildly different numbers of portsnap updates between i386 and amd64? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dcamp@alumni.ufl.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 18:21:22 -0000 Hi. I run 9.1-RELEASE on two boxes: one i386 and the other amd64. I've run the latter for a bit over a week. When I portsnap update, the 32-bit machine typically gets several to dozens or hundreds of updates, while the 64-bit machine typically gets none, or maybe a couple. What might be the explanation for this behaviour? Thank you, Christian _____________________________________________________ 3425 SW 2nd Ave, #239 cell (352) 514-7411 Gainesville, FL 32607-2813 dcamp@alumni.ufl.edu On this perfect day / Nothing's standing in my way... -Hoku