Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 21:30:51 -0700 From: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com> To: Dima Panov <fluffy@FreeBSD.org>, Rebecca Cran <bcran@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r525460 - in head: . sysutils sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve-devel sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve/files Message-ID: <f497fdde-555b-cf06-e434-f978e39ddc23@bsdio.com> In-Reply-To: <98b1bcb9-f2f4-432b-abd3-4885b1cb9de6@Canary> References: <202002070444.0174iOaP083542@repo.freebsd.org> <98b1bcb9-f2f4-432b-abd3-4885b1cb9de6@Canary>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2020-02-07 20:56, Dima Panov wrote: > > Did CSM option was removed by mistake?=C2=A0 > Sources still have this knob, -csm slave port still exist, and > bhyve-firmware port still defaults to both variants in depends Yes, it wasn't deliberate. But at the same time, CSM support is broken. So it might be a few days to a couple of weeks before I debug what's wrong and come up with a fix. Would you like to CSM option fixed in the port beforehand, perhaps with the csm option marked BROKEN? --=20 Rebecca Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f497fdde-555b-cf06-e434-f978e39ddc23>