From owner-freebsd-security Mon Aug 27 6: 1:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440E037B403 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 06:01:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.com) Received: from madman.nectar.com (madman.nectar.com [10.0.1.111]) by gw.nectar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F21447D for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:01:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by madman.nectar.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f7RD1BR70615 for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:01:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nectar) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:01:11 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: procmail, squid: any takers? Message-ID: <20010827080111.D70454@madman.nectar.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , freebsd-security@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I haven't seen any action on these two issues, so I will handle them this week. If you already have your finger on one of them, please speak up. I know it is boring, but there still appears to be a sizable backlog of advisory to-dos. You may want to check your archive of this list if you have a moment to handle one. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message