From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 23 04:59:06 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812B816A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:59:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B7143D1F
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:59:05 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBN4wv89002882;
	Thu, 23 Dec 2004 07:58:57 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iBN4wvOB002879;
	Thu, 23 Dec 2004 07:58:57 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from ache)
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 07:58:55 +0300
From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@asme.org>
Message-ID: <20041223045854.GA2637@nagual.pp.ru>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>,
	"Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@asme.org>,
	Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG,
	samy@kerneled.org
References: <41CA6B7A.5040500@asme.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <41CA6B7A.5040500@asme.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-3; AVE: 6.29.0.5;
	VDF: 6.29.0.31; host: nagual.pp.ru)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6
	(nagual.pp.ru [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 23 Dec 2004 07:58:58 +0300 (MSK)
cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
cc: samy@kerneled.org
cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: The recent TIOCREMOTE removal
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:59:06 -0000

> >Ignoring the fact that many operating systems have TIOCREMOTE implemented
> >(meaning, FreeBSD provides a nice new portability issue for now and the
> >unknowing future), several ports are *already* broken due to this.
> 
> I'm only aware of two ?  And I'm currently investigating them.

TIOCREMOTE removal should be backed out by any means. It is intensively 
used in emulators etc. Try to search google to see how many.

-- 
http://ache.pp.ru/