From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 13 06:49:00 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F36116A41F
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 06:49:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bsddiy@126.com)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3736D43D45;
	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 06:49:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsddiy@126.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (davidxu@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9D6mtnO037928;
	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 06:48:56 GMT (envelope-from bsddiy@126.com)
Message-ID: <434E0358.5060306@126.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:48:56 +0800
From: David Xu <bsddiy@126.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050928
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
References: <434DD327.7090200@126.com> <434DFA35.6070902@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <434DFA35.6070902@samsco.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: POSIX siginfo
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 06:49:00 -0000

Scott Long wrote:

> I'm by no means an expert in this work, but one thing that I will say is 
> that you should be careful and look at the previous attempts here in 
> FreeBSD.  I believe that Juli Mallett tried implementing signal queues a 
> coupld of years ago but pulled them out because it turned out hard to 
> make them reliable in low-memory situations.
> 
> Scott

Thanks, but that's not a problem for me, I have already considered it,
my perforce tree has code to handle the situation.

David Xu