Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:57:41 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r221993 - in head/sys: kern sys Message-ID: <2D767D47-5034-468B-9BC6-B69FDF4DC1D2@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20110517134402.GL48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20110516211954.GJ48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <22627.1305639371@critter.freebsd.dk> <20110517134402.GL48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 17, 2011, at 7:44 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 01:36:11PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <20110516211954.GJ48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>, Kostik = Belousov=20 >> writes: >>=20 >>> struct sbuf is exposed to the libsubf.so consumers. >>> I think that libsbuf.so version shall be bumped (since no symver >>> compat can be provided, due to lack of versioning for libsbuf). >>>=20 >>> The bump was also needed after the r212367. Lets do one for two = changes. >>=20 >> Ok, I'm done, >>=20 >> Question: Do we bumb the libsbuf version, or do we start using >> symbol-versioning, and if so, how is that done ? >=20 > We do bump the libsbuf version, regardless of the symbol versioning. > If symver is introduced, then it can be combined with the bump. >=20 > Please see = http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/symver/freebsd_versioning.txt > for the document describing the rules. >=20 > The exemplary use of the versioning for newly introduced library is > r221931. Also, there's a strong encouragement to go to symbol versioning as that = makes our lives much easier going forward. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2D767D47-5034-468B-9BC6-B69FDF4DC1D2>