From owner-freebsd-current Fri Dec 22 22:40:34 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA21982 for current-outgoing; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 22:40:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA21977 for ; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 22:40:32 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id XAA21503; Fri, 22 Dec 1995 23:36:01 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199512230636.XAA21503@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: More ancient IP broadcast cruft to be removed To: wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett A. Wollman) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 23:36:01 -0700 (MST) Cc: current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <9512201756.AA21859@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett A. Wollman" at Dec 20, 95 12:56:53 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I believe that this code is a waste of time. If the user wants to > accept broadcasts on the host-all-zeros address, then she should > configure the interface for that broadcast address. (Using the > standard broadcast address would not work to communicate with old > machines anyway, so this hack doesn't really gain one anything.) Gatewaying old and new broadcast formats on the same physical wire? Like a new net with old Apollo Domain systems? Any chance of #ifdef'ing it? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.