From owner-cvs-all Thu Dec 10 01:20:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA26545 for cvs-all-outgoing; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 01:20:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA26478; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 01:19:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA29697; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 01:19:16 -0800 (PST) To: Greg Lehey cc: Joseph Koshy , committers@hub.freebsd.org, vanmaren@fast.cs.utah.edu Subject: Re: Swat teams (was: problem reports) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 10 Dec 1998 16:21:17 +1030." <19981210162117.F12688@freebie.lemis.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 01:19:15 -0800 Message-ID: <29693.913281555@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > The big thing that many people forget here, though (and it applies at > least as much to commercial support organiziations) is that the real > purpose of a PR is to draw attention to a problem. The fact that the The problem with this line of thinking is that when there are over 1500 unclosed PRs, many of which are so old that they'll more than likely never be looked at again, they're not drawing attention to much more than the fact that there are over 1500 unclosed PRs. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message