From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 18 07:30:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33320106568B; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 07:30:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe12.tele2.se [212.247.155.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6595C8FC0A; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 07:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=KbpOe3bC1BgA:10 a=E9KEX5fJTvYA:10 a=9EOqclcOrCvqfm+fhAoUTA==:17 a=GQAYUx7HYwcimkJgA54A:9 a=bPAcZg6KsRMSj1VpofAA:7 a=gcPgkK6C7Dz-OnVUPdCjzBHEZ_IA:4 a=9aOQ2cSd83gA:10 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 Received: from [130.79.3.186] (account mc467741@c2i.net [130.79.3.186] verified) by mailfe12.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.6) with ESMTPA id 946315341; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:30:26 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:32:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20081015173319.GB46393@elvis.mu.org> <200810152124.12637.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810180932.33848.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" , "Sam Leffler \(FreeBSD Project\)" , current@freebsd.org, Alfred Perlstein Subject: Re: (forw) Re: USB4BSD - release candidate 2 - coming to FreeBSD this week. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 07:30:29 -0000 On Friday 17 October 2008, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > >> 6. Many files lack a copyright/license (e.g. modules/*). > > > > It is BSD licensed like the rest of the code. > > International law recognizes implicit copyright, not implicit > licensing. If you are the author then you are the implicit copyright > holder, unless you have signed a contract assigning the copyright to > someone else. So you are the only person legally allowed to add a > license statement to that code. Somebody else can do it, of course, > but only with your written permission; otherwise it would be a crime. Yes, but the files under modules/* are Makefile. Do Makefiles need a license. Else I completely agree with you. --HPS