From owner-freebsd-mobile Sat Feb 13 23:55:07 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA29980 for freebsd-mobile-outgoing; Sat, 13 Feb 1999 23:55:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA29975 for ; Sat, 13 Feb 1999 23:55:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from harmony [10.0.0.6] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.71 #1) id 10BwON-0003g0-00; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:55:03 -0700 Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.2/8.8.3) with ESMTP id AAA28688; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:57:08 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199902140757.AAA28688@harmony.village.org> To: Valentin Shopov Subject: Re: apm & current Cc: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 Feb 1999 07:39:58 PST." <19990213153958.2977.rocketmail@send1e.yahoomail.com> References: <19990213153958.2977.rocketmail@send1e.yahoomail.com> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:57:07 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <19990213153958.2977.rocketmail@send1e.yahoomail.com> Valentin Shopov writes: : Also kernel panics every time when I run apm, but zzz - suspend is : working. Odd. My Libretto 50CT works great with 4.0 -current as of a few weeks ago. apm and zzz both work w/o a hitch. What's the stack traceback on the kernel panic message? Can you enable DDB in your config file? : Before moving to 4.0-CURRENT my notebook run 2.2.8 wit PAO w/o problems. : Also now shutdown -p (PAO's -x opt) is not working too. Works for me. Well, I should say that halt -p works for me. I've never used shutdown on my libretto. The only time I've had it fail was when I had a bogus patch to the halt code... : So, incorporating PAO into 4.0 will be good , I think. This does not follow from what you have reported. Much of PAO has been incorporated into -current a long time ago (like months before 3.0 was released), although Nate has rewritten much of it to more closely conform to FreeBSD's goals and to cleanup the code. Much work of integration does need to be done. It isn't a binary either/or sort of thing either, since PAO and FreeBSD have different goals, standards, etc. Parts of PAO will likely continue to make their way into the base FreeBSD distribution. A big problem that I have with integrating more of their stuff is that I don't have all the hardware that is supported by PAO, so I can't test/play with it before putting it into -current/-stable. BTW, what laptop are you running? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message