From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 22 19:05:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8FB106568B; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:05:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8F28FC0A; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417C69CB091; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:02:50 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f7kOjpnQatTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:02:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7E29CB0DB; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:02:44 +0100 (CET) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBMJ2isJ057003; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:02:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:02:44 +0100 From: Roman Divacky To: Erik Cederstrand Message-ID: <20091222190244.GA56837@freebsd.org> References: <200912211943.nBLJhNUU038425@svn.freebsd.org> <200912211459.21766.jhb@freebsd.org> <20091221220004.GA42400@alchemy.franken.de> <20091221.211648.632868945383134253.imp@bsdimp.com> <20091222141810.GA17221@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, marius@alchemy.franken.de, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: svn commit: r200797 - head/lib/libc/stdtime X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:05:08 -0000 On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 04:49:48PM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Den 22/12/2009 kl. 15.18 skrev Roman Divacky: > > > well... llvm provides its own assembler so if the need for newer binutils > > comes from need of newer as I believe llvm can help here. or is the linker > > the problem? > > It does? I was under the impression that this was still very much a WIP (http://llvm.org/releases/2.6/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#mc) and that LLVM still uses the system assembler and linker. yes, it's a WIP. what I meant was that there's not so much pressure to import newer "as" as we might be getting that from llvm anyway in the time frame...