From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Apr 14 21:52:07 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA15061
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 21:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.75])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA15018
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 21:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unalmodem.usc.unal.edu.co (unalmodem17.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.47])
	by apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA24317;
	Mon, 14 Apr 1997 23:51:06 -0500 (COT)
Message-ID: <335323F9.60AD@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 23:45:19 -0700
From: Pedro Giffuni <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu>
CC: fullermd@narcissus.ml.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, terry@lambert.org,
        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Another Linux Religious war (was Re: Commercial vendors registry)
References: <199704150400.AAA01046@jenolan.caipgeneral>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

David S. Miller wrote:
> 
> Thats funny, we don't have any "Linux vs. FreeBSD" web pages in the
> Linux world, there are a few "Linux vs. NT" ones which are, from a
> free software perspective, much more relevant if you are truly
> interesting in seeing free software and Unix succeed.  I guess it is
> just akin to a food chain in the free Unix world.
> 

Anyone thinking of a new logo with a trident traversing a penguin these
days? :-)

I don't know where this anti-Linux war came from, and I don't like it
either. But to be honest this wars are started by Linux users that don't
understand Linux is MOT UNIX: in fact it's not even an OS, it's a kernel
a nacissist wrote and that is supported by some guys that openly admit
they are not UNIX.

Anyway, why not continue this interesting discussion in the chat list ?
I am not subscribed there.

Pedro.



> ---------------------------------------------////
> Yow! 11.26 MB/s remote host TCP bandwidth & ////
> 199 usec remote TCP latency over 100Mb/s   ////
> ethernet.  Beat that!                     ////
> -----------------------------------------////__________  o
> David S. Miller, davem@caip.rutgers.edu /_____________/ / // /_/ ><