From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 08:13:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D1016A406 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lawrance@FreeBSD.org) Received: from jay.exetel.com.au (jay.exetel.com.au [220.233.0.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4902E43D55 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 08:13:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lawrance@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 22939 invoked by uid 507); 9 May 2006 18:13:36 +1000 Received: from 180.205.233.220.exetel.com.au (HELO ?192.168.0.157?) (220.233.205.180) by jay.exetel.com.au with SMTP; 9 May 2006 18:13:36 +1000 In-Reply-To: <445F554B.5030708@utdallas.edu> References: <200605071004.k47A4upP048167@freefall.freebsd.org> <445F554B.5030708@utdallas.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <3EB527C5-434E-4C01-A8CD-F9007419BB1C@FreeBSD.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sam Lawrance Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:13:40 +1000 To: Paul Schmehl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Bill Fenner Subject: Re: Unfetchable distfiles reminder X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 08:13:38 -0000 On 09/05/2006, at 12:27 AM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > Bill Fenner wrote: >> Dear porters, >> This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of >> unfetchable distfiles at http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/ >> portsurvey/ . >> In particular, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with distfile >> problems, which currently has 203 bad ports, is >> http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ports@freebsd.org.html > Rather than a list of ports with unfectchable distfiles and no > maintainer, this appears to be a list of every port. > > Is the link incorrect? Or am I doing something wrong? I saw that and just searched for "0 files fetchable" or whatever it was.