Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:05:36 -0500 (EST) From: "Jonathan Noack" <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> To: "Peter Fraser" <petros.fraser@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtual memory consumption (both user and kernel) in modern CURRENT Message-ID: <61399.170.140.82.83.1140746736.squirrel@www.noacks.org> In-Reply-To: <aa2cc130602231241u15e464bcu848a4aef2998c50f@mail.gmail.com> References: <aa2cc130602231241u15e464bcu848a4aef2998c50f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter, 6.1 will be built from 6-STABLE, not -CURRENT. The next release scheduled from what is now -CURRENT is 7.0. -Jonathan Peter Fraser wrote: > It's truly a ptiy that so serious a thing is an issue so near to a > release. > I agree that users should be given a choice especially since some of us > run > non-threaded apps that spawn a number of processes. From what I have read, > wouldn't a squid + squidguard combination rely much more heavily on swap > now. If so, I think I will also stick with the 5 series and 6.0 in my > environment. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- Jonathan Noack | noackjr@alumni.rice.edu | OpenPGP: 0x991D8195
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?61399.170.140.82.83.1140746736.squirrel>